BONDYOPADHYAY v. USA
| PROBIR KUMAR BONDYOPADHYAY |
| USA |
| 1:2014cv00147 |
| February 24, 2014 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Eric G. Bruggink |
| Mary Ellen Coster Williams |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
232
REPORTED OPINION and ORDER granting 206 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 216 Motion of the Infringement Phase. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. No costs. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (dls) Service on parties made. (Plaintiff served via certified mail; Article No. 7016 3010 0000 4308 4003)
|
|
Filing
193
REPORTED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (ac7) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
45
UNREPORTED OPINION granting 17 Partial Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6). Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (vro) Copy to parties.
|
| Search for this case: BONDYOPADHYAY v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PROBIR KUMAR BONDYOPADHYAY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | John J. Fargo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
