HOCHSTETLER et al v. USA
Plaintiff: TODD HOCHSTETLER and KARISSA HOCHSTETLER
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv00221
Filed: March 21, 2014
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Eric G. Bruggink
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 REPORTED OPINION denying 23 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 27 Cross Motion The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. (bz1) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: HOCHSTETLER et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TODD HOCHSTETLER
Represented By: Steven Mathew Wald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KARISSA HOCHSTETLER
Represented By: Steven Mathew Wald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Cullen Saint-Real Shearburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?