MENDEZ v. USA
Plaintiff: JOSE MENDEZ
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv00497
Filed: June 10, 2014
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 94 REPORTED OPINION denying 83 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Copy to parties.
May 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 81 REPORTED OPINION granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (MEH) Copy to parties.
May 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 REPORTED OPINION dismissing Count I and Counts IV through VII and with respect to Counts II and III (breach claims), denying-in-part and converting/deferring-in-part 12 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6). Signed by Chief Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (mf) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: MENDEZ v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSE MENDEZ
Represented By: Kenneth Foard McCallion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Alexander Orlando Canizares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?