CHITTENDEN et al v. USA
Plaintiff: GENE CHITTENDEN and ALLEN D. HALL
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv00632
Filed: July 21, 2014
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Elaine D. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 REPORTED OPINION and ORDER granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment as to plaintiffs' fifth amendment takings claim; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs' tort and due process claims; and denying 17 Cross Motion. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Each side shall bear its own costs. Signed by Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (dls) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: CHITTENDEN et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GENE CHITTENDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALLEN D. HALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Heidi Lynn Osterhout
Represented By: Carter Fleeth Thurman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?