EQUA SOLUTIONS, INC. v. USA

Plaintiff: EQUA SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv01214
Filed: December 18, 2014
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Nancy B. Firestone
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 REPORTED OPINION. Defendant's cross-motion for judgment on the administrative record GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record DENIED. (Opinion originally issued under seal on 2/13/2015 - ECF No. 25). Signed by Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (dpk) Copy to parties.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the United States Federal Claims Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EQUA SOLUTIONS, INC. v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EQUA SOLUTIONS, INC.
Represented By: John Charles Dulske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Eric Evan Laufgraben
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?