OMRAN v. USA
Plaintiff: MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN OMRAN
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2015cv00186
Filed: February 26, 2015
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 UNREPORTED OPINION and ORDER granting 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for the limited purpose of addressing the court's jurisdiction, with the agency having custody of plaintiff to forward payments from plaintiff's accoun t to the Clerk of the Court of Federal Claims each time the account balance exceeds $10.00 and until the filing fee is paid in full; denying 6 Motion for trial by jury; granting 7 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1); and denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (dls) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: OMRAN v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN OMRAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Robert C. Bigler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?