PRYDE v. USA
Plaintiff: MARC PRYDE
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2015cv00878
Filed: August 14, 2015
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Lydia Kay Griggsby
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 72 UNREPORTED OPINION: denying 57 , 58 , and 65 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part 66 the Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing the complaint. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. (rdb) Service on parties made.
May 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Counsel for plaintiffs is ORDERED to pay one-quarter of the reasonable travel expenses, court reporter fees and attorney's fees incurred by the government due to counsel for plaintiffs' failure to comply with the Court's February 11, 2016 Scheduling Order. JSR due by 6/26/2017. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. (lh) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: PRYDE v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARC PRYDE
Represented By: Brian Gary Isaacson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Brian James Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?