JORDAN v. USA
MELZA E. JORDAN, SR. |
USA |
1:2015cv01175 |
October 9, 2015 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Margaret M. Sweeney |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 UNREPORTED OPINION and ORDER denying 26 Motion for Reconsideration; and ENJOINING plaintiff from submitting further documents to the court regarding this case. The Clerk shall not accept any further filings from plaintiff without first consulting with the judge. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (dls) Copy to parties. (Plaintiff served via certified mail; Article No. 7014 1200 0000 9093 6422) |
Filing 20 REPORTED OPINION AND ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1); granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (ac7) Copy to parties. (Tracking No. 9114 9014 9645 0594 5522 21) |
Search for this case: JORDAN v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MELZA E. JORDAN, SR. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Courtney Danielle Enlow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.