CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA
Plaintiff: CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant: USA
Intervenor_defendant: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.
Case Number: 1:2015cv01322
Filed: November 4, 2015
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Susan G. Braden
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 [REDOCKETED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES] UNREPORTED ORDER granting 34 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss - Rule 41(a) and dissolving 31 Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (dw1) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: Craig S. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Christopher Keith Wimbush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_defendant: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.
Represented By: Daniel Edward Chudd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?