BIRDBEAR et al v. USA
| ROGER BIRDBEAR, THOMAS P. BIRDBEAR, JAMIE LAWRENCE, RAE ANN WILLIAMS and NELSON BIRDBEAR |
| USA |
| EOG RESOURCES, INC., ALL ENERGY, INC., MARATHON OIL COMPANY and WHITING RESOURCES CORPORATION |
| 1:2016cv00075 |
| January 13, 2016 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Elaine D. Kaplan |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
274
UNREPORTED OPINION denying 242 Motion in Limine. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (ap) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
270
UNREPORTED OPINION denying 226 Motion in Limine to Exclude Cumulative and Irrelevant Witness Testimony; granting-in-part and denying-in-part 244 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence on Counts 1, 5, 11, and 12. The government's motion for summary judgment is due by 10/13/2023. Plaintiffs' response is due by 10/27/2023. The government's reply is due by 11/03/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (aa) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
207
REPORTED OPINION denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part the Government's Cross-Motion; granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Supplement Pleadings. Status Report due by 10/11/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (aa) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
127
UNREPORTED OPINION denying 115 Motion to Compel. Compliance due by 2/9/2018. Status Report due by 2/12/2018. Signed by Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (bh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
100
UNREPORTED OPINION granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Quash; granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion to Quash. Proposed Protective Order due by 7/12/2017. Signed by Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (bl) Copy to parties.
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
