CANPRO INVESTMENTS, LTD v. USA
Plaintiff: CANPRO INVESTMENTS, LTD
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2016cv00268
Filed: February 26, 2016
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 186 REPORTED OPINION AND ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 181 Motion for Clarification; withdrawing the Court's original Opinion (ECF No. 180), and reissuing upon reconsideration 180 Reported Opinion and Order, with certain corrections and amplifications; denying as moot 87 MOTION to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) as to remaining Section II.B filed by USA; granting in part and denying in part 129 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) or, Alternatively, MOTION for Summary Judgme nt filed by USA; denying 165 MOTION to Strike 156 Amended Complaint; granting in part and denying in part 165 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12 (b)(1) and (6) and Request for Consideration of Pending Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment filed by USA. (Joint Status Report due by 6/5/2023). Signed by Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (cmc) Service on parties made.
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 180 REPORTED OPINION and ORDER denying as moot 87 MOTION to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) as to remaining Section II.B filed by USA; granting in part and denying in part 129 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) or, Alternatively, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by USA; denying 165 MOTION to Strike 156 Amended Complaint; granting in part and denying in part 165 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12 (b)(1) and (6) and Request for Consideration of Pending Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment filed by USA. (Status Report due by 3/10/2023). Signed by Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (cmc) Service on parties made.
May 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 122 REPORTED OPINION on 87 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) filed by USA. Section II.A of defendant's motion is hereby DENIED. Briefing on Section II.B of defendant's motion remains stayed. Signed by Chief Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (am) Service on parties made.
November 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 45 UNREPORTED ORDER granting 39 Motion to Compel. Damages computation due 12/13/2017. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (pp) Copy to parties.
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 REPORTED ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration and denying as moot 30 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. Answer due by 4/27/2017. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (pp) Copy to parties.
January 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORTED ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) filed by USA. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (pp) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: CANPRO INVESTMENTS, LTD v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CANPRO INVESTMENTS, LTD
Represented By: Esperanza Segarra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Amanda L. Tantum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?