T.W. LAQUAY MARINE, LLC v. USA
Plaintiff: T.W. LAQUAY MARINE, LLC
Defendant: USA
Intervenor_defendant: JAR ASSETS, LLC
Case Number: 1:2016cv00544
Filed: May 3, 2016
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Susan G. Braden
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 55 REPORTED OPINION AND FINAL ORDER(re-issuance of August 9, 2016 Sealed Memorandum Opinion And Final Order). Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (ms) Copy to parties. (Main Document 55 replaced on 8/16/2016) (dls).
Search for this case: T.W. LAQUAY MARINE, LLC v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: T.W. LAQUAY MARINE, LLC
Represented By: Mark Reid Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Mark Edward Porada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_defendant: JAR ASSETS, LLC
Represented By: William Barron Arbuthno Avery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?