TETRA TECH AMT v. USA
Plaintiff: TETRA TECH AMT
Defendant: USA
Intervenor_defendant: DELL SERVICES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, INC.
Case Number: 1:2016cv00632
Filed: May 26, 2016
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Elaine D. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 REPORTED OPINION DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record and GRANTING Defendant's Motion for Judgement on the Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (bl) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: TETRA TECH AMT v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TETRA TECH AMT
Represented By: Holly Anne Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Nathanael Brown Yale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_defendant: DELL SERVICES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, INC.
Represented By: Craig Alan Holman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?