HORVATH v. USA
| MICHAEL HORVATH |
| USA |
| 1:2016cv00688 |
| June 13, 2016 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Lydia Kay Griggsby |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
UNREPORTED OPINION granting in part and deferring in part 85 Motion to Strike. The defendant's motion to strike the plaintiff's counsel's motion for attorneys' fees under the EAJA is GRANTED. The defendant's motion to st rike the bill of costs is DEFERRED. If the defendant continues to oppose the plaintiff's counsel's bill of costs, it shall file a supplemental memorandum not to exceed ten (10) pages of text by 2/26/2021. In the event the defendant files a supplemental memorandum on the bill of costs, the plaintiff's counsel may file a reply memorandum not to exceed ten (10) pages of text by 3/8/2021. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
80
Pursuant to the Joint Status Report (ECF 77) submitted by the parties on October 9, 2020, the Clerk is directed to enter final judgment for the plaintiff, Michael Horvath, in the amount of $3,419.81 in full satisfaction of the plaintiff's claim. Upon entry of the final judgment, the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
69
REPORTED OPINION that the plaintiffs motion to certify a class is denied. The Court will file an order concurrent with this opinion denying the motion and setting a schedule for further proceedings in the case. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (agg) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
56
UNREPORTED OPINION: The Court DENIES the defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF 44 ) and STAYS the plaintiff's motion for class certification (ECF 42 ). The parties have 60 days to review their respective records and identify and s ubmit to the Court any other instances, during the years relevant to Mr. Horvaths claim, for which the records indicate that he earned but did not receive § 5542(e) pay. If the Services broader review reflects that Mr. Horvath has received all the overtime pay due to him, the defendant may renew its motion for summary judgment. Until that review is complete, and the defendant determines whether to pursue a renewed motion for summary judgment, the Court will defer a decision on the plaintiffs motion. The parties will file a Joint Status Report by May 26, 2020. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (ah) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
12
REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6); denying 11 Motion to Strike. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. (atw) Copy to parties.
|
| Search for this case: HORVATH v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL HORVATH | |
| Represented By: | David James Vendler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Sosun Bae |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
