GODFREY v. USA
Plaintiff: SYLVAN GODFREY
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2016cv00954
Filed: August 4, 2016
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Susan G. Braden
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Susan G. Braden. (dw) Copy to parties. [Sent via certified mail: 7017 1450 0000 1346 0225]
March 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss; and denying plaintiff's 10 Motion to Amend and for Third Party Representative.. Signed by Chief Judge Susan G. Braden. (dls) Copy to parties. (Plaintiff served via certified mail; Article No. 7014 1200 0000 9093 6811)
Search for this case: GODFREY v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SYLVAN GODFREY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Courtney Danielle Enlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?