HOLMES v. USA
| GORDON R. HOLMES |
| USA |
| 1:2016cv01710 |
| December 29, 2016 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Victor J. Wolski |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
UNREPORTED ORDER remanding to the ABCMR. The remand period shall not exceed 90 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Thompson M. Dietz. (adb) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
43
REPORTED ORDER denying 24 Motion ; granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Remand. Signed by Senior Judge Victor J. Wolski. (er) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
3
UNREPORTED ORDER: Court requests plaintiff's consent to the court's referral of this case to the Court of Federal Claims Bar Association Pro Bono/Attorney Referral Pilot Program. Plaintiff's notice due by 1/23/2017. Signed by Judge Victor J. Wolski. (vds) Copy to parties.
|
| Search for this case: HOLMES v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GORDON R. HOLMES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
