DESPOT v. USA
Plaintiff: DAVID DESPOT
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2017cv00414
Filed: March 20, 2017
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Lettow
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 UNREPORTED OPINION and ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1). The Clerk shall enter judgment in accord with this disposition. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (ar) Copy to parties. [Sent via certified mail: 7017 1450 0000 1346 2892]
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order of Dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (vds) Copy to parties. U.S. Certified Mail #7014 1200 0000 9093 7184(Main Document 7 replaced on 5/30/2017 to change type of order) (vds).
Search for this case: DESPOT v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID DESPOT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Michael Duane Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?