EMIABATA v. USA
Plaintiff: PHILIP EMIABATA
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2017cv00447
Filed: March 24, 2017
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 REPORTED OPINION granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (hw1) Service on parties made.
November 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORTED OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6); and directing defendant to file its motion for summary judgment and proposed findings of uncontroverted fact by 12/22/17. Subsequent briefing shall be according to the court's rules. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (dls) Copy to parties. (Plaintiff served via certified mail; Article No. 7017 1450 0000 1346 0812)
Search for this case: EMIABATA v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHILIP EMIABATA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Alexander Orlando Canizares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?