CARTER v. USA
JEREMY MARQUISE CARTER |
USA |
1:2017cv00587 |
May 1, 2017 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Victor J. Wolski |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 UNREPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 17 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) filed by USA. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (amc) Service on parties made. |
Filing 13 UNREPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER dismissing all claims against private defendants for want of jurisdiction; denying plaintiff's demand for a jury trial; granting defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss with regard to counts two through fiv e and denying the motion to dismiss with regards to count one; and granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to cure the defects noted in the opinion. Plaintiff's amended complaint due by 3/5/18. Signed by Judge Victor J. Wolski. (dls) Service on parties made. (Plaintiff served via certified mail; Article No. 7016 3010 0000 4308 3815) |
Search for this case: CARTER v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JEREMY MARQUISE CARTER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Adam Eric Lyons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.