SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. USA
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. |
USA |
1:2017cv00825 |
June 19, 2017 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Eric G. Bruggink |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 426 REPORTED OPINION (reissued for publication of 422 **SEALED** MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING in part 352 Plaintiff SAIC's Motion to Strike Untimely Non-Infringing Alternatives and Non-Infringement Theories, solely as it pertains to Micro soft's non-infringement theory; GRANTING 377 Defendants' Joint Motion to Strike the Declaration of SAIC's Infringement Expert, Dr. Bajaj, Expressing New Infringement Opinions; DENYING 339 Intervenor-Defendant Microsof t Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness; DENYING 342 Defendant the United States and Third-Party Defendant L3 Technologies, Inc.'s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on I ndefiniteness; GRANTING 343 Intervenor-Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement; DENYING 341 Third-Party Defendant L3 Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infring ement; DENYING 340 Plaintiff SAIC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement by the Government; and DENYING as MOOT 340 Plaintiff SAIC's Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the Desert's Edge Prior Art Status). Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (cj) Service on parties made. |
Filing 419 REPORTED OPINION (reissued for publication of 415 **SEALED** MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING in part 352 Plaintiff SAIC's Motion to Strike Untimely Non-Infringing Alternatives and Non-Infringement Theories, as it pertains to the n on-infringing alternatives theories; DENYING 350 SAIC's Daubert Motion to Exclude Testimony Regarding Alleged Non-Infringing Alternatives; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 353 Defendants' Joint Rule 702 Motion to Partially Exclude the Amended Expert Damages Report of David A. Haas). Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (ms) Service on parties made. |
Filing 329 REPORTED OPINION (reissued for publication of 327 SEALED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 289 Plaintiff's Combined Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to RCFC 37 and Partial Motion to Strike Invalidity Contentions and DENYING 308 Defendants' Rule 37 Cross-Motion to Exclude SAIC's Undisclosed Damages Theory). Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (lb) Service on parties made. |
Filing 318 REPORTED OPINION (reissued for publication of 311 SEALED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 272 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37). Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (dzg) Service on parties made. |
Filing 299 REPORTED OPINION (reissued for publication of 294 SEALED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 253 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration.) Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (rt16) Service on parties made. |
Filing 225 REPORTED OPINION (re-issuance for publication of 221 SEALED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 210 L3's Motion for Protective Order). Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (hb) Service on parties made. |
Filing 172 REPORTED OPINION granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (LS) Service on parties made. |
Filing 170 ORDER granting 169 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Goutam Patnaik . Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (rt16) Service on parties made. (Main Document 170 replaced on 3/15/2021 to replace incorrect document upload) (sh). |
Filing 120 REPORTED OPINION granting 114 MOTION to Notify Interested Party L3 Technologies, Inc. and Harris Corporation Pursuant to RCFC 14(b) filed by USA. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a Rule 14 Notice as specified in the Opinion. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (klb) Service on parties made. Modified on 5/12/2020 (jt1). |
Filing 14 REPORTED ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(6); on 8 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by USA. Signed by Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. (wr) Service on parties made. |
Search for this case: SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. | |
Represented By: | Christopher C. Campbell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Alex Hanna |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.