CARTWRIGHT et al v. USA
Plaintiff: RICHARD D. CARTWRIGHT and SHIRLEY V. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2017cv01094
Filed: August 14, 2017
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Victor J. Wolski
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 UNREPORTED Order denying as moot 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Victor J. Wolski. U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail Receipt Tracking #7017 1450 0000 6959 9696(vds) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: CARTWRIGHT et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD D. CARTWRIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY V. CARTWRIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Brian James Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?