BANKSTON v. USA
ANGELIQUE NICHOLE BANKSTON |
USA |
1:2017cv01449 |
October 4, 2017 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Victor J. Wolski |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 UNREPORTED ORDER: Granting in part and Denying in part 21 Motion for Reconsideration - Rule 59(a). Signed by Judge Victor J. Wolski. U.S. Certified Mail Receipt Tracking# 7017 1450 0000 1346 1864(vds) Service on parties made. |
Filing 19 UNREPORTED OPINION: DENYING as MOOT 12 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6); This case is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Victor J. Wolski. U.S. Certified Mail Tracking # 7017 1450 0000 1346 4865(vds) Service on parties made. |
Filing 16 UNREPORTED ORDER denying 4 Motion for Relief from Judgment - Rule 60. Signed by Judge Victor J. Wolski. (vds) Service on parties made. |
Search for this case: BANKSTON v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ANGELIQUE NICHOLE BANKSTON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Adam Eric Lyons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.