ALLEN v. USA
||September 11, 2019
||United States Federal Claims Court
|Nature of Suit:
||Miscellaneous - Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1491 Tucker Act
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 11, 2019
Order of Dismissal. (1) The clerk's office is directed to ENTER judgment for defendant DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, without prejudice, pursuant to RCFC l2(h)(3); (2) The clerk's office is directed to RETURN any future filings not in compliance with this court's rules to plaintiff, UNFILED, without further order of the court, except for any notice of appeal; and (3) Because plaintiff has repetitiv ely filed complaints which needlessly consume the resources of the court, the court enters the following anti-filing injunction: Mr. Allen is immediately ENJOINED from filing any new complaints with this Co urt without first obtaining leave from the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims to do so. Any motion for leave to file must include as an attachment a full complaint that meets all of the requirements of RCFC 8; in particular th e complaint must identify the source of law supporting this court's jurisdiction over the claims asserted. Thus, the clerk's office is directed to REJECT all future complaints from Mr. Allen unless filed by leave of the Chief Judge. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via U.S. Certified Mail [7018 1830 0001 4963 6823] (hw1).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the United States Federal Claims Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?