LANDGRAF v. USA
1:2020cv00066 |
May 13, 2020 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
Contract - Lease (CDA) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 Order of Dismissal. As explained in the Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently with this Order, the plaintiff is unable, as a matter of law, to establish the existence of a binding contract with the United States for the removal of his brush. Accordi ngly, the defendant's motion to dismiss 24 is GRANTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment dismissing the complaint. No costs are awarded. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made. |
Filing 20 UNREPORTED OPINION and ORDER DENYING 6 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12 (b)(1) and (6) (Answer due 5/27/2020, Joint Status Report proposing discovery schedule due 5/27/2020). Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (ah) Service on parties made. |
Search for this case: LANDGRAF v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.