SEKRI, INC. v. USA
Case Number: |
1:2021cv00778 |
Filed: |
March 9, 2021 |
Court: |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Office: |
COFC Office |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract - (Post Award) Injunction |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 21, 2023 |
Filing
151
REPORTED OPINION on 146 MOTION for Review of Clerk's Action on Costs re 145 Costs Taxed filed by SEKRI, INC. The plaintiff's motion for review is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In addition to the $907.0 0 awarded by the Clerk for its costs of the suit, the plaintiff has justified the award of an additional $195.30 for costs associated with the preparation of the joint appendix on appeal. Accordingly, the Clerk shall award the plaintiff the sum of $1,102.30 for its costs. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (lw) Service on parties made.
|
June 1, 2023 |
Filing
139
REPORTED OPINION denying 118 , 119 , and 120 Motions for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11; denying 121 Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 28 USC 2412; and denying as moot 137 Motion to Curtail Further Briefing. Under 28 USC 2412(b), the pl aintiff has failed to demonstrate that the defendant acted in bad faith and that the plaintiff incurred fees and expenses as a result of that misconduct. The plaintiff also does not qualify as a "party" under 28 USC 2412(d). The plaintiff's motions for sanctions pursuant to RCFC 11 are both procedurally and substantively defective. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (kac) Service on parties made.
|
March 13, 2023 |
Filing
115
REPORTED OPINION. In this pre-award bid protest, the plaintiff's pricing claim is dismissed. The plaintiff's claim that as a mandatory source, it is entitled to 100 percent of a contract for Advanced Tactical Assault Panels is granted. The plaintiff's bad-faith claim is dismissed without prejudice. Injunctive relief is awarded to the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (kac) Service on parties made.
|
January 31, 2023 |
Filing
86
UNREPORTED OPINION denying 82 the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction for failure to show irreparable harm absent a preliminary injunction. The Court also ADOPTS the following schedule: administrative record due by 2/10/2023, cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record and any motion to dismiss due by 2/24/2023, and cross-response briefs due by 3/7/2023.. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (kac) Service on parties made.
|
December 16, 2022 |
Filing
72
REPORTED OPINION dismissing the plaintiff's claims, granting the plaintiff leave to amend its complaint, and denying the plaintiff's motion to enforce the decision of the Federal Circuit and motion to complete the administrative record. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (kac) Service on parties made.
|
March 22, 2021 |
Filing
25
REPORTED OPINION. Reissued public opinion of the Court's March 9, 2021 sealed opinion granting the defendant's motion to dismiss and dismissing the plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made.
|
March 9, 2021 |
Filing
22
Order of Dismissal. For the reasons assigned in the memorandum opinion filed concurrently with this Order of Judgment, the complaint is DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of standing pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. In addition, the defendant's motion to dismiss 13 is GRANTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims.The parties shall meet and confer and jointly propose by 3/23/2021 redactions to the memorandum opinion so that the Court may release it publicly. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in accordance with the memorandum opinion and this Order and close the case. No costs are awarded. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made. Modified font of text on 3/9/2021 (ead).
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?