DARTON INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA

DARTON INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA

Case Number:	1:2021cv00856
Filed:	April 14, 2021
Court:	United States Federal Claims Court
Office:	COFC Office
Nature of Suit:	Contract - (Post Award) Injunction
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 19, 2021	Filing 63 REPORTED OPINION. Reissued public opinion of the Court's April 14, 2021, sealed memorandum opinion granting the defendant's and defendant-intervenor's motions for judgment on the administrative record and denying the plaintiff's motion. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (naw) Service on parties made. Modified by replacing PDF with corrected on 4/19/2021 (ead).
April 14, 2021	Filing 60 ORDER. For the reasons provided in the 59 Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently with this Order, the plaintiff's 38 motion for judgment on the administrative record is DENIED, and the motions for judgment on the administrative record of the defendant 41 and the defendant-intervenor 40 are GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the defendant and defendant-intervenor. The parties shall confer and file by April 28, 2021, a joint status report proposing any redactions to the 59 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (naw) Service on parties made.

Date Filed

Document Text

April 19, 2021

Filing 63 REPORTED OPINION. Reissued public opinion of the Court's April 14, 2021, sealed memorandum opinion granting the defendant's and defendant-intervenor's motions for judgment on the administrative record and denying the plaintiff's motion. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (naw) Service on parties made. Modified by replacing PDF with corrected on 4/19/2021 (ead).

April 14, 2021

Filing 60 ORDER. For the reasons provided in the 59 Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently with this Order, the plaintiff's 38 motion for judgment on the administrative record is DENIED, and the motions for judgment on the administrative record of the defendant 41 and the defendant-intervenor 40 are GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the defendant and defendant-intervenor. The parties shall confer and file by April 28, 2021, a joint status report proposing any redactions to the 59 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (naw) Service on parties made.

Search for this case: DARTON INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?