REDMOND v. USA
SCOTT D. REDMOND and JOHN DOE |
USA |
1:2022cv00060 |
January 13, 2022 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
Elaine D Kaplan |
Miscellaneous - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Service on parties made.) (dls) |
Filing 13 MOTION Requesting Court provide assurance to receive a 'fair hearing' re #11 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Unreported Opinion, filed by SCOTT D. REDMOND. Service: 1/25/2022. [Filed by Leave of the Judge](vds) Modified on 2/2/2022 to terminate pending gavel (vds). |
Filing 12 MOTION for leave to proceed under the pseudonym "John Doe". re #11 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,, Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel,, Unreported Opinion,, filed by SCOTT D. REDMOND. Service: 1/24/2022. [Filed by Leave of the Judge](vds) |
Filing 11 UNREPORTED OPINION dismissing case; granting #7 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #10 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying Plaintiff's motion for recusal; denying Plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (tjd) Service on parties made. |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by SCOTT D. REDMOND. Service: 1/26/2022. Response due by 2/9/2022.(vds) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Ioana Cristei for USA . (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Cristei, Ioana) |
Filing 8 Electronic Notification Consent Form. (vds) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by SCOTT D. REDMOND. Service: 1/24/2022. Response due by 2/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(vds) |
Filing 6 ORDER directing Plaintiff to either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (Attachments: #1 application to proceed in forma pauperis)(tjd) Service on parties made. |
Filing 5 REISSUED AMENDED GENERAL ORDER No. 2 dated 3/3/2021 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Order issued on 3/18/2020, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (vds) Service on parties made. |
Filing 4 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (vds) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds) |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (vds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (VAR) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by SCOTT D. REDMOND. Answer due by 3/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(vds) Modified on 1/19/2022 to edit response date(vds). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/2/2022: #3 Exhibit Additional exhibit in support of Complaint, #4 Exhibit Additional Exhibit in support of Complaint, #5 Exhibit Additional Exhibit in support of Complaint) (vds). Modified on 2/2/2022 to add addition exhibits; See order #11 filed 2/1/22(vds). |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.