ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S. v. USA
Plaintiff: ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S.
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2022cv00202
Filed: February 23, 2022
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Presiding Judge: Edward H Meyers
Nature of Suit: Contract - (Post Award) Injunction
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2022 Complaint dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) this day. (dls)
April 10, 2022 Filing 20 **SEALED**STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice, filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S... (Gdanski, Sam)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER Cancelling Oral Argument/Hearing on #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction scheduled for April 11, 2022, at the National Courts Building. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER Setting Oral Argument/Hearing on Motion #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Motion Hearing set for 4/11/2022 11:00 AM in National Courts Building before Judge Edward H. Meyers. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
April 5, 2022 Filing 19 **SEALED**RESPONSE to #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Permanent Injunction , filed by USA.Reply due by 4/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Pixley, Joseph)
March 29, 2022 Minute Entry - Was the proceeding sealed to the public? Y. If Yes, only parties to the case may order a copy of the transcript. Proceeding held in Washington, DC 3/28/2022 through 3/28/2022 before Judge Edward H. Meyers: Status Conference. [Total number of days of proceeding: 1] Approximate duration of proceeding: 30 minutes. Official record of proceeding taken by court reporter. To order a certified transcript or an audio recording of the proceeding, click #HERE.(rmc)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SCHEDULING ORDER: Government's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction due by 4/5/2022. Plaintiff's Reply due by 4/8/2022. Hearing on Preliminary Injunction set for 4/11/2022 11:00 AM before Judge Edward H. Meyers. The parties shall advise whether the hearing is in-person or via Zoom by 4/7/2022. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER: Status Conference set for 3/28/2022 02:00 PM in Video Conference - Zoom before Judge Edward H. Meyers. Dial-in information will be circulated separately. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER following 3/11/2022 status conference: Administrative Record due by 3/28/2022. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
March 11, 2022 Minute Entry - Was the proceeding sealed to the public? Y. If Yes, only parties to the case may order a copy of the transcript. Proceeding held in Washington, D.C. (Zoom) 3/11/2022 before Judge Edward H. Meyers: Hearing. [Total number of days of proceeding: 1] Approximate duration of proceeding: 30 minutes. Official record of proceeding taken by court reporter. To order a certified transcript or an audio recording of the proceeding, click #HERE.(vds)
March 9, 2022 Filing 16 **SEALED**RESPONSE to #15 Response , filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration Onder Tumer, #2 Exhibit Exhibit Onder Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B Onder Declaration, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A to Response, #5 Exhibit Exhibit B to Response, #6 Exhibit Exhibit C to Response)(Gdanski, Sam)
March 3, 2022 Filing 15 **SEALED**RESPONSE to #14 Scheduling Order, , filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Pixley, Joseph)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: Government brief on GAO Protective Order due by 3/3/2022. Plaintiff's brief on GAO Protective Order due by 3/9/2022. Hearing set for 3/11/2022 at 01:00 PM in Video Conference - Zoom before Judge Edward H. Meyers. Administrative Record due by 3/16/2022. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
February 25, 2022 Minute Entry - Was the proceeding sealed to the public? Y. If Yes, only parties to the case may order a copy of the transcript. Proceeding held in Washington, D.C. 2/25/2022 before Judge Edward H. Meyers: Status Conference. [Total number of days of proceeding: 1] Approximate duration of proceeding: 30 minutes. Official record of proceeding taken via AT&T Record Feature. To order a certified transcript or an audio recording of the proceeding, click #HERE.(ead)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying as premature #7 Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER: Status Conference set for 2/25/2022 at 12:00 PM before Judge Edward H. Meyers. Instructions on how to dial-in to the conference will be provided separately. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (rmc) Service on parties made.
February 24, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Alan Pixley for USA . (Pixley, Joseph)
February 24, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (ead)
February 24, 2022 Filing 8 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Edward H. Meyers. (ead)
February 23, 2022 Filing 7 **SEALED** MOTION to Supplement the Administrative Record, filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S.Response due by 3/9/2022. (ead)
February 23, 2022 Filing 6 **SEALED**PROPOSED REDACTED COMPLAINT, filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S. Redaction of #1 Complaint, FILED UNDER SEAL. (ead)
February 23, 2022 Filing 5 **SEALED** MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and MOTION for Permanent Injunction, filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S.Response due by 3/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Confidential Memorandum of Law In Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction)(ead)
February 23, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Protective Order and MOTION to Seal Document, filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S. Response due by 3/9/2022(ead)
February 23, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE NO Related Case(s), filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S. (ead)
February 23, 2022 Filing 2 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S. (ead)
February 23, 2022 Filing 1 **SEALED**COMPLAINT against USA (ARM) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-7696654) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S..Answer due by 4/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C1, #4 Exhibit C2, #5 Exhibit C3, #6 Exhibit C4, #7 Exhibit C5, #8 Exhibit C6, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit W, #11 Exhibit F, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Certificate of Service, #14 Affidavit)(ead)

Search for this case: ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S. v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ZAFER TAAHUT, INSAAT VE TICARET A.S.
Represented By: Sam Zalman Gdanski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Joseph Alan Pixley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?