OYARZUN v. USA
Plaintiff: LUISA OYARZUN
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2022cv00226
Filed: February 28, 2022
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Presiding Judge: Kathryn C Davis
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 UNREPORTED ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Full filing fee due on or before April 21, 2022. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (tmr) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
March 21, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by LUISA OYARZUN. FILED BY LEAVE OF THE JUDGE. Service: 3/21/2022. Response due by 4/7/2022.(sh)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER filing Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by leave of the judge. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Deficiency Memo)(tmr) Service on parties made. Modified on 3/22/2022 Plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (hw1).
March 7, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Liridona Sinani for USA . (Sinani, Liridona)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay filing fees or file application to proceed in forma pauperis by 3/31/2022. The deadline for Defendant's response to the Complaint #1 is hereby STAYED pending further Court order. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(tmr) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REISSUED AMENDED GENERAL ORDER No. 2 dated 3/3/2021 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Order issued on 3/18/2020, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (sh) Service on parties made.
March 1, 2022 Filing 4 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (sh)
March 1, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (sh)
March 1, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (sh)
February 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (VAR) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by LUISA OYARZUN. Answer due by 5/2/2022.(sh)

Search for this case: OYARZUN v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LUISA OYARZUN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Liridona Sinani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?