BOYCE v. USA
| RODNEY B. BOYCE |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv00229 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Marian Blank Horn |
| Military Pay - Back Pay |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Unopposed MOTION establish schedule for further proceedings re #1 Complaint , filed by USA.Response due by 5/11/2022.(Phillips, Vincent)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent de Paul Phillips for USA . (Phillips, Vincent)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (rp)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Marian Blank Horn. (rp)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (AF) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-7711387) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by RODNEY B. BOYCE. Answer due by 5/2/2022.(rp)
|
| Search for this case: BOYCE v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RODNEY B. BOYCE | |
| Represented By: | Robert Feldmeier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Vincent de Paul Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
