LOPEZ v. USA
| ARTHUR LOPEZ |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv00330 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Eleni M Roumel |
| Stephen S Schwartz |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Stephen S. Schwartz for all further proceedings. Judge Eleni M. Roumel is no longer assigned to the case. (sh)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (rt16) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER striking #8 Notice of Appearance. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (rt16) Service on parties made. plaintiff served via first class mail. (sh).
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (rt16) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Jude Carhart for USA . (Carhart, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 8
***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER ECF #11 .*** NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Jude Carhart for USA . (Carhart, Matthew) Modified on 4/19/2022 (sh).
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Eleni M. Roumel for all further proceedings. Judge Richard A. Hertling no longer assigned to the case. (jt1) Plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, the Clerk is directed to reassign this case at random to another judge of this court. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (agg) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
|
|
Filing 5
REISSUED AMENDED GENERAL ORDER No. 2 dated 3/3/2021 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Order issued on 3/18/2020, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (fm) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (fm)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Richard A. Hertling. (fm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by ARTHUR LOPEZ. Service: 3/22/2022. Response due by 4/8/2022. (fm)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by ARTHUR LOPEZ. Answer due by 5/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (fm)
|
| Search for this case: LOPEZ v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ARTHUR LOPEZ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Jude Carhart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
