ACKERMAN et al v. USA
| MATTHEW ACKERMAN, DAVID ADAMS, LUCIA ADAMS, CESAR ALICEA, LARRY ALLEN, LARRY ALLESHOUSE, DEREK ALVAREZ, FERNANDO AMALLA, STEVEN ANAYA and BRIAN ANDERSON |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv00410 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Armando O Bonilla |
| Civilian Pay - Back Pay |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Proceedings , filed by All Defendants.Response due by 6/21/2022.(Parnell, Catharine) |
Filing 6
ORDER the Clerk is directed to FILE plaintiffs' #4 Amended Complaint on the date the attempted filing (i.e. April 21, 2022); and moving forward, plaintiffs' are directed to include the case number and the name of the assigned judge directly below the docket number in accordance with RCFC 10(a) and 5.5(g), respectively. Signed by Judge Armando O. Bonilla. (ead) Service on parties made.
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Catharine Parnell for USA . (Parnell, Catharine) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to #6 Order, filed by leave of the Judge- First AMENDED COMPLAINT against USA, filed by All Plaintiffs. Amendment to #1 Complaint, , filed by All Plaintiffs. Answer due by 6/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Whitehead, Jack) Modified on 4/27/2022 - corrected answer deadline.(py). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (hw1) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Armando O. Bonilla. (hw1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-7816624) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by LARRY ALLESHOUSE, DAVID ADAMS, CESAR ALICEA, LARRY ALLEN, STEVEN ANAYA, FERNANDO AMALLA, MATTHEW ACKERMAN, BRIAN ANDERSON, DEREK ALVAREZ, LUCIA ADAMS. Answer due by 6/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(hw1) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
