M & L ROGERS, LLC
Plaintiff: M & L ROGERS, LLC
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2022cv00411
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Presiding Judge: Armando O Bonilla
Nature of Suit: Taking - Rails to Trails
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Michael Chellis for USA . (Chellis, Christopher)
April 13, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (hw1)
April 13, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Armando O. Bonilla. (hw1)
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-7809237) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by M & L ROGERS, LLC. Answer due by 6/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hw1)

Search for this case: M & L ROGERS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M & L ROGERS, LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Christopher Michael Chellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?