ACHOMBOM et al v. USA
| DERICK ACHOMBOM, ROBERT ADAMS, ADESUNKANMI ADEKOYA, ALVAREZ ALANO, BENJAMIN ANDERSON, RAFAEL ANGULO, TONY ANTOINE, TYLER BAKER, JOHNNY BATISTE, MARCO BERUMEN, ALANO ALVAREZ and MARCO BERUMEN, et al |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv00458 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Carolyn N Lerner |
| Civilian Pay - Back Pay |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against USA, filed by All Plaintiffs. Amendment to #5 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint, , filed by All Plaintiffs.Answer due by 6/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Whitehead, Jack) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Stay. Within 30 days of the date the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Case No. 21-1662 becomes final, the parties shall file a joint status report. Plaintiffs may amend the Complaint to add additional plaintiffs during the pendency of the stay. Signed by Judge Carolyn N. Lerner. (dbj) Service on parties made.
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Stay case , filed by USA.Response due by 6/16/2022.(Iarossi, Albert) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against USA, filed by All Plaintiffs. Amendment to #1 Complaint, , filed by All Plaintiffs.Answer due by 6/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Whitehead, Jack) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Albert Salvatore Iarossi for USA .. (Iarossi, Albert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (ac7) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Carolyn N. Lerner. (ac7) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-7838593) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by All Plaintiffs.Answer due by 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ac7) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
