SMITH v. USA
| DONALD FRANK SMITH |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv00619 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Kathryn C Davis |
| Unjust conviction and Imprisonment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 41(b), that plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's order. (Service on parties made.) (ac7) Plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (tmr) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert C. Bigler for USA . (Bigler, Robert) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Because Plaintiff has previously filed at least three complaints that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, and the #1 Complaint fails to demonstrate that he is under imminent threat of serious physical injury, Plaintiff must pay the $402 filing fee to proceed with this action. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Full filing fee due by 7/7/2022. Failure to comply will result in dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Defendant's response to the Complaint is hereby STAYED pending further Court order. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (tmr) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
|
|
Filing 5
REISSUED AMENDED GENERAL ORDER No. 2 dated 3/3/2021 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Order issued on 3/18/2020, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (sh) Service on parties made.
|
| Filing 4 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (sh) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by DONALD FRANK SMITH. Answer due by 8/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sh) |
| Search for this case: SMITH v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DONALD FRANK SMITH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Robert C. Bigler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
