SCOTT v. USA
Plaintiff: CALVIN W. SCOTT
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2022cv00846
Filed: August 1, 2022
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Presiding Judge: Kathryn C Davis
Nature of Suit: Civilian Pay - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION Request for an Expedited Hearing, filed by CALVIN W. SCOTT. Response due by 10/11/2022. FILED BY LEAVE OF THE JUDGE. (py)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION to file Amended Restitution, filed by CALVIN W. SCOTT. Response due by 10/11/2022. FILED BY LEAVE OF THE JUDGE. (py)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER filing Plaintiff's documents by leave of the judge. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Amended Request for Expedited Hearing, #2 Amended Motion for Restitution)(apkt) Service on parties made. Mailed to plaintiff via first class mail on 9/26/2022 (ac7).
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 UNREPORTED ORDER denying #11 - #12 Reconsideration of Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee on or before 10/7/2022. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will dismiss his case for failure to prosecute under RCFC 41(b). Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (apkt) Service on parties made.
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION Request for an Expedited Hearing, filed by CALVIN W. SCOTT. Response due by 10/3/2022. FILED BY LEAVE OF THE JUDGE (py)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by CALVIN W. SCOTT. Response due by 10/3/2022.(py) FILED BY LEAVE OF THE JUDGE. (1) Letter to Court from Plaintiff) (py).
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filing Plaintiff's documents by leave of the judge. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Deficiency Memo, Amended Request for an Expedited Hearing, #2 Deficiency Memo, Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #3 Deficiency Memo, Letter to Judge)(apkt) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via first class mail on 9.20.2022 (py).
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Hamilton for USA, filed by USA. Service: 9/7/2022.(sh)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Intervention, filed by CALVIN W. SCOTT. Service: 8/30/2022. FILED BY LEAVE OF THE JUDGE Response due by 9/16/2022.(sh) . Modified on 8/30/2022 to correct document title(sh).
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER filing Plaintiff's Motion for Intervention by leave of the judge. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Deficiency Memo)(tmr) Service on parties made. (Main Document 7 and Attachment 1 replaced on 8/30/2022) to upload correct documents(sh). Plaintiff served via first class mail on 08.30.2022 (cam). Modified on 8/30/2022 (cam).
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 UNREPORTED ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee on or before 9/21/2022. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will dismiss his case for failure to prosecute under RCFC 41(b). It is further ORDERED that the Court REJECTS the SD card attached to Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk shall return the SD card to Plaintiff unfiled. It is finally ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint is hereby STAYED pending further Court order. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (tmr) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via U.S. certified mail No 7018 2290 0000 5183 8426. Modified on 8/24/2022 (sh).
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REISSUED AMENDED GENERAL ORDER No. 2 dated 3/3/2021 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Order issued on 3/18/2020, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (sh) Service on parties made.
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (sh)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (sh)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by CALVIN W. SCOTT. Service: 8/1/2022. Response due by 8/18/2022.(sh)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **SEALED**COMPLAINT against USA (VAR) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by CALVIN W. SCOTT. Answer due by 10/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(sh) Document sealed pursuant to RCFC 5.2 (sh).

Search for this case: SCOTT v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CALVIN W. SCOTT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Jason Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?