KPMG LLP v. USA
| KPMG LLP |
| USA |
| DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
| 1:2022cv00866 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Loren A Smith |
| Contract - (Post Award) Injunction |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER granting #25 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's Reply due by 10/14/2022. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 25
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/14/2022 to file KPMG's Reply in Support of the Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record , filed by KPMG LLP.Response due by 10/20/2022.(Casimir, Dominique)
|
|
Filing 24
**SEALED**CROSS MOTION and RESPONSE to #17 Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record, filed by KPMG LLP, filed by USA.Response due by 10/18/2022. (Rayel, William)
|
|
Filing 23
**SEALED**CROSS MOTION and RESPONSE to #18 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, filed by KPMG LLP, filed by USA.Response due by 11/1/2022. (Rayel, William)
|
|
Filing 22
**SEALED** MOTION for Judgment on the Administrative Record , filed by DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP.Response due by 11/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cohen, David)
|
|
Filing 21
**SEALED**RESPONSE to #17 MOTION to Supplement the Administrative Record , filed by DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP.Reply due by 10/11/2022.(Cohen, David)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to #17 MOTION to Supplement the Administrative Record. Response due by 10/4/2022. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (cew) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 19
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until October 4, 2022 to File Response as to #17 MOTION to Supplement the Administrative Record , filed by USA.Response due by 10/11/2022.(Rayel, William)
|
|
Filing 18
**SEALED** MOTION for Judgment on the Administrative Record , filed by KPMG LLP.Response due by 10/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Casimir, Dominique)
|
|
Filing 17
**SEALED** MOTION to Supplement the Administrative Record, filed by KPMG LLP.Response due by 9/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Casimir, Dominique)
|
|
Filing 16
**SEALED**ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD , filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Certification, Index, and Tabs 1a-1zdd, #2 Tabs 2a-57, #3 Tabs 58-80)(Rayel, William)
|
|
Filing 15
APPLICATION for Access to Protected Material by Dominique Casimir, Robyn Burrows, and Michael Montalbano, filed by KPMG LLP.Response due by 8/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 PO Application of Robyn Burrows, #2 PO Application of Michael Montalbano)(Casimir, Dominique)
|
|
Filing 14
Application for Access to Protected Material, filed by DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Access applications for Cohen, Schnell, O'Brien, Cardenal, Moy. (Cohen, David) Modified on 8/24/2022 - corrected docket event/text (jt1).
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER:Administrative Record due by 8/29/2022. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgement on the Administrative Record due by 9/16/2022. Defendant and defendant-intervenor Responses to MJAR and Cross-Motions due by 10/4/2022. Plaintiff's Reply and Response due by 10/14/2022. Defendant and defendant-intervenor Replies due by 10/24/2022. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Protective Order and PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made. Modified docket text on 8/24/2022 (rp).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Seal Document #1 Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Minute Entry - Was the proceeding sealed to the public? Yes. If Yes, only parties to the case may order a copy of the transcript. Proceeding held in Washington, D.C. 8/22/2022 before Senior Judge Loren A. Smith: Status Conference. [Total number of days of proceeding: 1] Approximate duration of proceeding: 30 minutes. Official record of proceeding taken by court reporter. To order a certified transcript or an audio recording of the proceeding, click #HERE.(msh)
|
|
Filing 9
REDACTED DOCUMENT redacting #1 Complaint,, filed by KPMG LLP. (Casimir, Dominique)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Intervene , filed by DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP.Response due by 9/1/2022.(Cohen, David)
|
|
STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER: Status Conference set for 8/22/2022 at 3:00 PM EDT in Chambers (Telephonic) before Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (py)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Loren A. Smith. (py)
|
|
Filing 5
**SEALED** MOTION for Protective Order, filed by KPMG LLP. Service: 8/8/2022. Response due by 8/22/2022. (py)
|
|
Filing 4
**SEALED** MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint, filed by KPMG LLP. Service: 8/8/2022. Response due by 8/22/2022. (py)
|
|
Filing 3
**SEALED**PROPOSED REDACTED DOCUMENT, filed by KPMG LLP. Redaction of #1 Complaint, FILED UNDER SEAL. Service: 8/8/2022.(py)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by William Porter Rayel for USA . (Rayel, William)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED**COMPLAINT against USA (140) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-8084452) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by KPMG LLP. Answer due by 10/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13)(py)
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
