HASHI v. USA
Plaintiff: ISAAC HASHI
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2022cv01393
Filed: September 21, 2022
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Presiding Judge: David A Tapp
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE and granting #6 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to ENTER judgment DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to RCFC 12(h)(3). Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (krm) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls) Modified on 10/28/2022 to add languare re: granting motion for ifp. (dls).
October 24, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by ISAAC HASHI. Service: 10/24/2022. Response due by 11/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(ypb)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (vds) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via U.S. first class mail on this day. Modified on 9/28/2022 (vds).
September 28, 2022 Filing 4 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. first class mail on this day. Modified on 9/28/2022 (vds).
September 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. first class mail on this day. Modified on 9/28/2022 (vds).
September 28, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge David A. Tapp. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. first class mail on this day. Modified on 9/28/2022 (vds).
September 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by ISAAC HASHI. Answer due by 11/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Mailing Envelope)(vds)

Search for this case: HASHI v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ISAAC HASHI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?