PATEL v. USA
RAJ K. PATEL |
USA |
1:2022cv01446 |
October 3, 2022 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Loren A Smith |
Miscellaneous - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, received on 11/22/2022, rejected pursuant to #14 Anti-Filing Order,. (ew) |
Filing 15 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint. (Service on parties made.) (dls) |
Filing 14 ANTI-FILING ORDER. The Clerk shall dismiss this case and reject all future filings from Raj K. Patel, except for a properly submitted notice of appeal, without further order of the court. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made. |
Filing 12 MOTION for More Definite Statement, filed by RAJ K. PATEL. Service: 11/15/2022. Response due by 11/29/2022.(ew) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 12/16/2022. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made. |
Filing 13 ORDER REJECTING DOCUMENT: Order received on 10/31/2022. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Defect Memo)(ew) Service on parties made. |
Filing 10 ORDER denying #7 Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite and Seal the Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made. |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Ralph Kiepura for USA . (Kiepura, Robert) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Loren A. Smith. (msh) Service on parties made. |
Filing 7 MOTION to Expedite, MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint, filed by RAJ K. PATEL.Response due by 10/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(py) |
Filing 6 GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (py) Service on parties made. |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (py) |
Filing 4 Notice of Direct Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.2(a) to Judge Loren A. Smith. (py) |
Filing 3 Electronic Notification Consent Form. (py) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by RAJ K. PATEL.Response due by 10/17/2022.(py) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Filing fee $402) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by RAJ K. PATEL.Answer due by 12/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(py) |
Search for this case: PATEL v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RAJ K. PATEL | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Robert Ralph Kiepura |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.