HILLS v. USA
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEWIS HILLS
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2022cv01628
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Presiding Judge: David A Tapp
Nature of Suit: Unjust conviction and Imprisonment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2022 CAFC Case Number 2023-1280 for #9 Notice of Appeal filed by ROBERT LEWIS HILLS. (ac7)
December 19, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL, filed by ROBERT LEWIS HILLS. Copy to CAFC. (ac7)
December 19, 2022 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit re #9 Notice of Appeal. (ac7)
November 15, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. ) (dls)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Clerk is directed to ENTER judgment DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to RCFC 12(h)(3). Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (krm) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via U.S. mail on 11.14.22 (ac7).
November 9, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Loren Harlow for USA . (Harlow, Christopher)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (ypb) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via U.S. mail on this day Modified on 11/2/2022 (vds).
November 2, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (ypb)Plaintiff served via U.S. mail on this day Modified on 11/2/2022 (vds).
November 2, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge David A. Tapp. (ypb) Plaintiff served via U.S. mail on this day Modified on 11/2/2022 (vds).
October 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by ROBERT LEWIS HILLS. Service: 11/2/2022. Response due by 11/17/2022.(ypb)
October 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Filing fee $402) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by ROBERT LEWIS HILLS.Answer due by 12/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(ypb)

Search for this case: HILLS v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEWIS HILLS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Christopher Loren Harlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?