PHILLIPS v. USA
| DEAN ERVIN PHILLIPS |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv01709 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Charles F Lettow |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MOTION for Authority, filed by DEAN ERVIN PHILLIPS. Service: 1/11/23. Response due by 1/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supplement (Memorandum in Support), #2 Supplement (Certificate of Service)). Filed by leave of the Judge.(tb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER regarding plaintiff's additional motion submitted on 1/4/2023. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(poz) Service on parties made. (Main Document 11 replaced on 1/11/2023) (Corrected PDF added with the correct date) (tb).
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by DEAN ERVIN PHILLIPS. Service: 12/28/2022. [Filed by Leave of the Judge](vds)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER regarding plaintiff's 12/28/2022 submission. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(poz) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua David Tully for USA . (Tully, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 7
Electronic Notification Consent Form. (tb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing plaintiff to complete IFP application within 30 days. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow. (eah) Service on parties made. Sent to Plaintiff via U.S. first class mail 11/28/2022. (ac7).
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (tb) Service on parties made. Docket # 3-5 sent to Plaintiff via U.S. first class mail 11/21/2022. (ac7).
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Charles F. Lettow. (tb)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (tb)
|
|
Filing 2
**SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by DEAN ERVIN PHILLIPS. Service: 11/14/22. Response due by 12/1/2022. Motion sealed pursuant to RCFC 5.2(tb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by DEAN ERVIN PHILLIPS. Answer due by 1/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Exhibits 1-3), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tb) Exhibits sealed pursuant to RCFC 5.2
|
| Search for this case: PHILLIPS v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DEAN ERVIN PHILLIPS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Joshua David Tully |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
