MONTCALM POINT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. USA
MONTCALM POINT ASSOCIATES, INC. |
USA |
1:2022cv01760 |
December 2, 2022 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Stephen S Schwartz |
Taking - Rails to Trails |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , filed by USA.JPSR due by 3/20/2023.(Chellis, Christopher) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Michael Chellis for USA . (Chellis, Christopher) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (ew) |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (ew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-8358323) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by MONTCALM POINT ASSOCIATES, INC..Answer due by 1/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ew) |
Search for this case: MONTCALM POINT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MONTCALM POINT ASSOCIATES, INC. | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Christopher Michael Chellis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.