TENNANT v. USA
KENNETH CHARLES TENNANT |
USA |
1:2023cv00070 |
January 13, 2023 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Elaine D Kaplan |
Miscellaneous - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Amend Complaint. Amended Complaint due by 4/12/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (aa) Service on parties made. |
Filing 10 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, filed by KENNETH CHARLES TENNANT. Service: 3/7/2023. Response due by 3/21/2023.(vds) |
Filing 9 ORDER REJECTING DOCUMENT: Letter received on February 28, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (aa) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via First Class mail on 3/3/2023. (fm). |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING UNFILED: amended complaint received February 21, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (aa) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served with order and amended complaint returned via U.S. mail on this day Modified on 2/22/2023 (vds). |
Filing fee received re: #1 Complaint, $ 402, receipt number pending. (ac7) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen J Smith for USA . (Smith, Stephen) |
Filing 6 ORDER Filing Fee or IFP Application due by 2/23/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (aa) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served first class mailed on 1/24/2023.) |
Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (vds) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via U.S. Mail. (rp). |
Filing 4 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. Mail. (rp). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. Mail. (rp). |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. Mail. (rp). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (VAR) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by KENNETH CHARLES TENNANT. Answer due by 3/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Supplement Mailing Envelope)(vds) |
Search for this case: TENNANT v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KENNETH CHARLES TENNANT | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Stephen J Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.