BITSCOPIC, INC. v. USA
| BITSCOPIC, INC. |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv00094 |
| January 25, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Eleni M Roumel |
| Contract - (Pre Award) Injunctions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER setting Initial Status Conference for January 31, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. EST via Zoom before Judge Eleni M. Roumel. The Court will separately provide the parties with Zoom information. Joint Status Report due by 12:00 p.m. EST on January 30, 2023. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (smh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Corrected Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (smh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 9
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (smh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 8
**SEALED**Corrected MOTION For Leave to File Under Seal re #2 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint, MOTION for Protective Order , filed by BITSCOPIC, INC..Response due by 2/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Complaint with Proposed Redactions, #2 Complaint - Proposed Redacted Version, #3 Complaint Exhibits with Proposed Redactions, #4 Complaint Exhibits - Proposed Redacted Version, #5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction with Proposed Redactions, #6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction - Proposed Redacted Version, #7 Declaration of Harms with Proposed Redactions, #8 Declaration of Harms - Proposed Redacted Version)(Chiow, Jeffery)
|
|
Filing 7
**SEALED** MOTION for Preliminary Injunction , filed by BITSCOPIC, INC..Response due by 2/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Harm Declaration)(Chiow, Jeffery)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Evan Wisser for USA . (Wisser, Evan)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (sh)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (sh)
|
|
Filing 3
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, filed by BITSCOPIC, INC. Service: 1/25/2023.(sh)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint and MOTION for Protective Order, filed by BITSCOPIC, INC. Service: 1/25/2023. Response due by 2/8/2023.(sh)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED**COMPLAINT against USA (VA) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-8465185) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by BITSCOPIC, INC. Answer due by 3/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sh) Complaint served by email on DOJ by secure zip.
|
|
MINUTE ORDER denying in part and granting in part #2 Motion to Seal and Motion for Protective Order. Plaintiff's Motion to Seal is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion to seal must include proposed redacted versions of all documents sought to be filed under seal, in accordance with paragraph 6(b), Appendix C of this Court's Rules. Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED. The Court will separately enter a protective order. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (smh) Service on parties made.
|
| Search for this case: BITSCOPIC, INC. v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BITSCOPIC, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffery M. Chiow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Evan Wisser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
