FLORES v. USA
| ERIC FLORES |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv00194 |
| February 6, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Eleni M Roumel |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, without leave to replead. (Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. ) (dls)
|
|
Filing 9
REPORTED OPINION GRANTING #7 Defendant's Motion for Summary Dismissal, and DENYING AS MOOT #2 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court shall REJECT all future filings in this case that are not in accordance with the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. This Court enters the following anti-filing injunction: Effective immediately, Plaintiff Eric Flores is ENJOINED from filing new complaints pro se in this Court without first obtaining leave to file from the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims. If Plaintiff seeks to file a new complaint in this Court, he shall submit a Motion for Leave to File and explain why the new complaint is timely and properly before the Court. Any motion for leave to file a new complaint must also include as an attachment the complaint Plaintiff intends to file. The complaint must satisfy the requirements of Rule 8. In the event the Court grants a motion for leave to file a new complaint, Plaintiff will be required to pay the Courts full filing fee to proceed. Notwithstanding the prior restrictions, Plaintiff may file a new complaint without first submitting a Motion for Leave if the complaint is signed and filed by an attorney who is duly licensed and authorized to practice law under the laws of at least one state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia and is a member in good standing of the Bar of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (lb) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER staying Defendant's obligation to respond to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (lb) Service on parties made. Modified on 3/2/2023 (ew). Plaintiff served via first class mail.
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISMISSAL, filed by USA.Reply due by 3/3/2023. (Olson, Kristin)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Kristin Elaine Olson for USA . (Olson, Kristin)
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (sh) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via first class mail on 02.10.2023 (mjk). Modified on 2/10/2023 (mjk).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (sh) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 02.10.2023 (mjk). Modified on 2/10/2023 (mjk).
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (sh) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 02.10.2023 (mjk). Modified on 2/10/2023 (mjk).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by ERIC FLORES. Service: 2/6/2023. Response due by 2/24/2023.(sh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (VAR) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by ERIC FLORES. Answer due by 4/14/2023.(sh)
|
| Search for this case: FLORES v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ERIC FLORES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Kristin Elaine Olson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
