WILLIAMSON v. USA
Plaintiff: HASKELL ARMOND WILLIAMSON and HASKELL ARMOND WILLIAMSON, JR.
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2023cv00263
Filed: February 21, 2023
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Presiding Judge: Elaine D Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Unjust conviction and Imprisonment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction. (Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. ) (dls)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 UNREPORTED OPINION DISMISSING CASE. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (ap) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 5/15/2023 to File Answer re #1 Complaint , filed by USA.Response due by 5/4/2023.(Jantzen, Margaret)
March 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Joy Jantzen for USA . (Jantzen, Margaret)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (vds) Service on parties made. Modified on 2/23/2023 (ew). Plaintiff served docket entries 3-5 via first class mail.
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (vds)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by HASKELL ARMOND WILLIAMSON. Service: 2/21/2023. Response due by 3/7/2023.(vds)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by HASKELL ARMOND WILLIAMSON. Answer due by 4/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Mailing Envelope)(vds)

Search for this case: WILLIAMSON v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HASKELL ARMOND WILLIAMSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HASKELL ARMOND WILLIAMSON, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Margaret Joy Jantzen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?