LOFTON v. USA
| SOMONA LOFTON |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv00393 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| David A Tapp |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Offenbacher Aradi for USA . (Aradi, Laura) |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. ) (dls) |
Filing 8
Order of Dismissal granting #7 Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. The Clerk is also directed to reject future submissions unless they comply with rules regarding post-dismissal submissions. Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (emc) Service on parties made. Modified on 4/10/2023 to correct docket text (ypb). Plaintiff served via certified mail: 7018 2290 0000 5183 6002. Docket text modified on 4/10/2023 for clarity.(dls).
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by SOMONA LOFTON.Response due by 4/19/2023.(ac7) Modified on 4/10/2023 (ypb). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay filing fee or submit IFP application on or by 4/6/2023. Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (emc) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via Certified mail #70182290000051837368 on 3/23/23.(tb).
|
| Filing 5 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (ypb) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (ypb) Service on parties made.
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge David A. Tapp. (ypb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (ypb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (VAR) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by SOMONA LOFTON.Answer due by 5/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ypb) |
| Search for this case: LOFTON v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SOMONA LOFTON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Laura Offenbacher Aradi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
