AMOS v. USA
| BRENT WESLEY AMOS |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv00438 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Edward J Damich |
| Military Pay - Correct Records |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer due by 7/28/2023. Signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Damich. (lp1) Service on parties made.
|
| Filing 11 **SEALED**SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re: #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, filed by BRENT WESLEY AMOS. Filed by Leave of the Judge . (py) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Damich. (Attachments: #1 Deficiency Memorandum)(py) Service on parties made.
|
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/28/2023 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , filed by USA. (Singley, Eric) |
| Filing 8 **SEALED**RESPONSE to #7 MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/28/2023 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , filed by BRENT WESLEY AMOS. Reply due by 5/30/2023.(py) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/28/2023 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , filed by USA.Response due by 5/31/2023.(Singley, Eric) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Notification Consent Form. (py) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric John Singley for USA . (Singley, Eric) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (py) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via US Mail on 3/29/2023. (jwg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (py) Plaintiff served via US Mail on 3/29/2023. (jwg) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Edward J. Damich. (py) Plaintiff served via US Mail on 3/29/2023. (jwg) |
| Remark: A second check in the amount of $52 was erroneously included with the complaint and returned 3/29/2023 via certified mail no. 7018 2290 0000 5183 7412. (jwg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (AF) (Filing fee $402, receipt number pending) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by BRENT WESLEY AMOS. Answer due by 5/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Supplement Mailing Envelope)(py) |
| Search for this case: AMOS v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BRENT WESLEY AMOS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Eric John Singley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
