LOPEZ v. USA
| ARTHUR LOPEZ |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv00620 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Stephen S Schwartz |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #7 Motion to Reassign Case. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (py) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.22.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/22/2023 (cam).
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew James Hunter for USA . (Hunter, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Correct/Change Designation to Electronic Filing., filed by ARTHUR LOPEZ. Service: 5/25/2023. Response due by 6/8/2023.(ew)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Reassign Case - Rule 40.1(c), filed by ARTHUR LOPEZ. Response due by 5/18/2023. Filed by leave of the Court. (py)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER construing "Plaintiff's Request to Disqualify Judge Stephen S. Schwartz for Perceived Bias", received on 5/2/2023, as a "Motion to Reassign Pursuant to Rule 40.1(c)." The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to FILE by leave of the Court "Plaintiff's Request to Disqualify Judge Stephen S. Schwartz for Perceived Bias" as a "Motion to Reassign Pursuant to Rule 40.1(c)." Once docketed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to refer this motion to Chief Judge Kaplan for consideration. Signed by Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (cmc) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via first class mail on 05.08.2023 (cam). Modified on 5/8/2023 (cam).
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (vds) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via first class mail on 05.01.2023 (mjk).Modified on 5/1/2023 (mjk).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 05.01.2023 (mjk). Modified on 5/1/2023 (mjk).
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (vds) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 05.01.2023 (mjk). Modified on 5/1/2023 (mjk). Modified on 5/1/2023 (mjk).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by ARTHUR LOPEZ. Service: 4/24/2023. Response due by 5/8/2023.(vds)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by ARTHUR LOPEZ. Answer due by 6/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Service)(vds)
|
| Search for this case: LOPEZ v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ARTHUR LOPEZ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Andrew James Hunter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
