DAVIS v. USA
| ALFRED DAVIS |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv00994 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Richard A Hertling |
| Tax - Income, Individual |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 41(b), dismissing plaintiff's complaint, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. (Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. ) (dls) |
Filing 8
Order of Dismissal. Because the plaintiff has neither remitted the filing fee nor filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, including the prisoner authorization form, within the time established by the Court's order, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. No costs are awarded. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (agg) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. (dls)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Thomas Collins for USA . (Collins, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, no later than 7/14/2023, the plaintiff shall either pay the $402.00 in required fees or submit the attached application to prisoner authorization form. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (Attachments: #1 Authorization Form)(agg) Service on parties made. Modified on 7/3/2023 - Plaintiff served via first class mail on 07.03.2023 (hw1).
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (vds) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.30.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/30/2023 (cam).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.30.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/30/2023 (cam). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Richard A. Hertling. (vds) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.30.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/30/2023 (cam). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by ALFRED DAVIS. Service: 6/28/2023. Response due by 7/12/2023.(vds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (TRE) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by ALFRED DAVIS. Answer due by 8/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Mailing Envelope)(vds) |
| Search for this case: DAVIS v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ALFRED DAVIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Michael Thomas Collins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
